Hopp til hovedinnholdet
Lauren Juliff
2 min lesing

Scope 3 Emissions in the UK Reporting Landscape

It is imperative that companies measure, assess and seek to reduce their value chain emissions to achieve real world emissions reduction in line with the goals of the Paris agreement.

We encourage our investee companies to report their Scope 3 emissions and to set verified Science Based Targets.

However, our research shows that Scope 1-3 emissions data can provide a misleading indicator of transition risk for investors when applied indiscriminately across all sectors and industries. Emissions data, in particular Scope 3 (alone or aggregated with Scopes 1 & 2), is a necessary but not sufficient indicator of company transition risk. Standardisation of risk metrics is crucial for comparability within sectors and industries but Scope 3 is a complex category which is currently inconsistently applied by both companies and data providers. Further, the GHG Protocol Scope 3 standard does not offer a complete picture of forward-looking transition risk for companies involved in delivering climate solutions.

Given the focus of the ISSB is financially material risk for investors, we believe some adjustments need to be considered in the application of Scope 3 data for financial risk reporting and capital allocation.

In this paper we have summarised our response to the UK government’s consultation on Scope 3 emissions in the UK reporting landscape and offer some proposals for additional pieces of emissions-related information and guidance that we believe would be valuable for investors.

Read the full paper here:

Scope 3 Emissions in the UK Reporting Landscape.pdf

White Papers

'Magnificent' Performance - A Review of Climate Index Strategies

Analysis of the top overweight positions of climate index tracking funds relative to the market cap ... Les saken nå

Mer fra White Papers

The Future of Paris Aligned Investing

A decade on from the signing of the Paris Agreement, we reflect on the progress made and what it ...

Gridlock: The case for electricity grid investments in a ‘Paris Aligned’ portfolio

Any scientific pathway for net zero, or alignment with the goals of the Paris agreement, involves ...

The Paris Alignment Paradox: Scoping Out Solutions

Despite their laudable aims to avoid "counterintuitive results", "prevent greenwashing" and ...

Historisk avkastning er ingen garanti for framtidig avkastning. Fremtidig avkastning vil som blant annet bero på markedsutviklingen, forvalternes dyktighet, fondets risikoprofil og forvaltningshonorar. Avkastningen kan bli negativ som følge av kursnedgang. Det er risiko forbundet med investering i fond på grunn av bevegelser i markedet, valutautvikling, rentenivå, samt konjunktur-, bransje- og selskapsforhold. Avkastningen kan øke eller minke som følge av valutakursendringer. Før du investerer, oppfordrer vi deg til å lese fondets prospekt og nøkkelinformasjon, som inneholder ytterligere detaljer om fondets egenskaper og kostnader.