Skip to main content
Emine Isciel is attending IPBES12 in Manchester, UK
3 min read time

Restoring the Business and Biodiversity Balance: From Silent Risk to Collective Responsibility

For decades, warnings of ecosystem collapse were treated as the domain of activists and specialized scientists. But as of late January 2026, the conversation has fundamentally shifted with the UK Government’s Nature Security Assessment.  The collapse of global ecosystems is a "grade-A" risk to national security and, by extension, the global financial system.

This week’s twelfth session of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES12) represents a landmark moment for the corporate world. The Plenary, taking place in Manchester, UK, will be invited to approve the Business and Biodiversity Assessment, a highly anticipated report that will fundamentally reshape how businesses understand and act to rebalance their relationship with nature. 

The silent engine of GDP

All businesses depend on biodiversity and its associated ecosystem services, yet the impacts of their activities have long been overwhelmingly negative: 14 out of 18 categories of nature’s contributions to people show declines since 1970[1]. Several critical global ecosystems such as the Amazon, the Congo Basin, boreal forests, the Himalayas, and Southeast Asia’s coral reefs and mangroves are on a "pathway to collapse". These are not abstract losses. These regions regulate the very climate, water cycles, and weather patterns that underpin our global food supply. For the private sector, this isn't just about ethics; it's about supply chain solvency and can lead to systemic collapse.

According to the World Economic Forum, more than half of the world’s total GDP—approximately $44 trillion—is moderately or highly dependent on nature. From the insects that pollinate our crops to the wetlands that filter our water and the forests that stabilize our climate, "ecosystem services" are the silent employees that never send an invoice.

When these services vanish, the costs are not just environmental; they are fiscal. The Dasgupta Review on the Economics of Biodiversity highlighted that our current economic measures, like GDP, fail to account for the depreciation of "natural capital." 

The Enabling Environment Imperative

The finance sector is no longer a bystander in the nature crisis. The narrative that private finance is solely a driver of ecosystem destruction is beginning to shift. While the scale of "nature-negative" investments remains vastly disproportionate to conservation funding, the last few years have seen a surge in concrete, innovative action from the financial sector to protect biodiversity and hedge against systemic risk. 

Financial institutions are increasingly recognizing that biodiversity loss presents an "unhedgeable risk" and are channeling capital into tangible solutions. However, private finance still makes currently up less than 20% of total biodiversity funding. Despite strong interest, as reflected in the latest Finance for Biodiversity Impact Report, the primary barrier is an inadequate "enabling environment" that fails to translate ecological risk into material financial risk and nature-positive opportunities into clear returns. Creating this environment requires targeted interventions from policymakers and regulators to reshape market dynamics.

The IPBES Assessment is an important scientific exercise that comes at a time when there is increasing recognition of the central role of businesses in halting biodiversity loss; the choice is no longer whether to act, but how quickly they can adapt. The financial sector has stepped up its own commitment but requires a clear, consistent policy landscape to de-risk investments and channel capital at the necessary scale – the ball is now firmly in the court of governments to create an environment that will help businesses to restore the biodiversity balance and accelerate our transition to a nature-positive economy that will benefit us all.

-----
 
[1] IPBES Global Assessment (2019)

Climate and Nature

Storebrand AM wins Collaborative Leadership for Nature award

Recognition at Finance for Biodiversity Member Progress Awards 2025 Read the article now

More about Climate and Nature

Integrating Nature Data Into Investment Decisions

New analysis confirms Nordic companies outperform global peers on nature-related impacts, but ...

Storebrand joins panels at the Future of ESG Data EMEA 2025 conference

Emine Isciel and Lars Qvigstad Sørensen joined panels at the Future of ESG Data EMEA 2025 ...

Storebrand AM excludes Rio Tinto PLC and Rio Tinto Ltd

Decision based on deforestation impact of mining project in the Amazon.

Historical returns are no guarantee for future returns. Future returns will depend, inter alia, on market developments, the fund manager’s skills, the fund’s risk profile and management fees. The return may become negative as a result of negative price developments. There is risk associated with investing in funds due to market movements, currency developments, interest rate levels, economic, sector and company-specific conditions. Returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. Prior to making a subscription, we encourage you to read the fund's prospectus and key investor information document which contain further details about the fund's characteristics and costs.